It built the problem in the first place. seniorgrade is a real senior engineer who reads your actual code and tells you — in plain English — whether it's safe to put real users and real data behind it.
● Read-only — we can't change, push or delete anything. Your code is never executed, and deleted after the audit.
Built to review apps from the tools founders actually use
You built something with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or Claude. It runs. It looks finished. You've been using it yourself, maybe with a few friends. Now you want real users and real data behind it — and the doubt hits.
The AI that built it won't tell you honestly. It built the problem in the first place.
Same green checkmarks. Completely different answer.
Checks what's visible from the outside. Built by the same kind of AI that created your vulnerabilities.
Understands your context — auth, data model, multi-tenancy, payment logic — and the things only a human catches.
You'd never merge an intern's pull request without reading it. "The AI wrote it" is that same unread code — and deploy-first, think-never is exactly how a green checkmark becomes a data leak.
Just the findings that matter — a clear risk read, ordered by what gets you in trouble first. For each one: how dangerous it is, and how much work the fix is.
Critical risks first. Read it top-to-bottom and stop when you've run out of time — the important things are already at the top.
Exposed secrets, broken auth, an unlocked database, missing tenant isolation, scaling traps.
We go through the findings together so you know exactly what to do — and in what order.
A focused production-readiness review — a fast senior read of the biggest launch risks in each area, prioritized. Not a full penetration test or an exhaustive enterprise audit; the things that actually break first.
Exposed secrets, broken auth, unprotected endpoints, injection risks. The things that turn into an incident on day one.
Database access rules, row-level security, tenant isolation — can one customer reach another's data?
Where it falls over under real load: naive queries, missing indexes, N+1s, no caching, blocking operations.
How it's deployed and configured — environment separation, secrets management, backups, what happens when something fails.
How code gets to production: pipeline, staging vs. prod, rollback, whether a bad deploy can be undone safely.
A check against what you set out to build — gaps between the requirements in your head and what the code actually does.
You get this as a prioritized report — critical first — with an honest fix estimate for each. Want it fixed? We quote you afterwards. Or run the free 2-minute self-check first →
Representative examples of what a senior engineer finds in vibe-coded apps — the kind of issues, prioritized. Illustrative, not specific clients; real anonymized case studies follow as audits ship.
Three blockers fixed before launch — relaunched safely within a week.
allow read: if true).Tenant boundary enforced server-side — the data-leak path was closed.
.env file.Rate limits added and the query indexed — ready for the launch spike.
After checkout, a 2-minute form — what you built and what you're worried about — plus read-only access to your repo. We never get write access.
Shashank reviews your actual code — security, auth, data access, scale, the architecture your AI made silently. Not a queue, not a scanner.
The complete report, critical risks first, in plain English, with a fix estimate for each — and a call to walk through it together. Questions go straight to the engineer.
After the audit we quote the fixes clearly. No obligation: the $49 buys the review and the truth; whether we fix it is entirely your call.
Read-only access · your code is never executed · deleted after the audit.
SeniorThe name promises an experienced human — so here he is. A computer-science-trained engineer who works hands-on with the same AI tools your app was built with, Shashank reviews the security- and production-critical parts of your code: auth flows, data model, payment logic, the architecture decisions your AI made silently. He's the one who finds the bug where everything looks green and your backend is still wide open. Not a scanner, not a junior, not a queue — one experienced engineer, start to finish.
We can't change, push or delete anything. We only read.
Your code is read for the review only — it's never run on our machines.
Once the report is delivered, your code is removed from our side.
Your code is used for your review. Never shared with third parties.
46 reviews from people who had a senior engineer read their AI-built app before launch.
Seniorgrade helped me catch issues I would have missed because the app looked finished from the outside. The main finding was that one internal admin route still had weak protection. The report was specific, prioritized, and easy to hand over to my developer.
The review felt different from an automated scanner. It looked at the actual logic of the app, not just surface-level vulnerabilities. Seniorgrade found an endpoint that could become expensive under abuse because rate limiting was missing.
We had built a client portal quickly and needed someone to check whether it was safe enough to hand over. Seniorgrade found gaps in tenant separation and file access. The audit saved us from launching something that looked polished but was not yet production-ready.
We had an internal sales tool that stored customer and lead data. Seniorgrade found permission issues that could have allowed the wrong users to access records. That was a serious finding and exactly why we wanted a review.
The best part was the prioritization. The report separated urgent launch blockers from improvements that could wait. That helped us avoid wasting time polishing minor things while a real authorization issue still existed.
Seniorgrade identified several small architecture problems and one serious security concern. The report changed our launch plan, but in a productive way. We fixed the main issue and launched with more confidence.
I recommended Seniorgrade to a team that had built an MVP almost entirely with AI. The audit gave them a sober view of what was actually ready and what was still risky. It was useful because the report translated technical issues into business risk.
I had created a dashboard that connected to several data sources. Seniorgrade found a weak access pattern and suggested a cleaner way to handle credentials. That prevented a potentially serious data exposure.
seniorgrade isn't a consultancy that's never shipped. We build and operate our own products — with the same AI tools you use — so we read your code the way we read our own.
Real software in production, with real users and real data — like leadscraper.de. We run into the same production realities this report flags, and fix them.
Getting AI-built apps to production is a craft we've turned into a repeatable, modern method on our own projects — and that's exactly what your audit applies.
Operated by Deimann Com GmbH in Hamburg — German engineering standards, GDPR-aware, and real humans behind every audit, not a faceless queue.
"It works" buys you a demo. It doesn't buy you a business. Here's what unreviewed vibe-coded software actually costs once real users and real data show up.
Solid for ten. At ten thousand — on launch day, when everyone's watching — it falls over.
Exposed customer data isn't just embarrassing. Under GDPR, a breach can mean fines into the millions.
Raise or sell, and technical due diligence opens the hood. Security holes and tangled code cut your price — or kill the deal.
Unreviewed shortcuts compound. One day the codebase is too tangled to extend, and you start over — losing months.
Every unreviewed fix spawns three more. Soon you're all firefighting and no shipping.
An open, un-rate-limited endpoint is an invitation. A bored script can run your cloud or AI costs into four figures overnight — on your card.
Shipping vibe-coded software without a senior read is building on quicksand — it looks solid, right up until you put real weight on it.
Founders, PMs — even testers — ship code directly now: fast, AI-assisted, no tickets. It dropped the one thing the old way always had: a senior read before production. Here's the modern setup that puts it back — without slowing you down.
How product development really changed — and the setup it needs →
Still have a question? Email [email protected] — ask before you buy, and we'll tell you honestly.
An audit doesn't just protect you. Vibe-coded apps quietly overspend, and a senior read finds the waste — so the $49 often comes back in the first month, then keeps saving.
Uncached and duplicate LLM calls, oversized context, retries, and endpoints with no rate limit — you pay for every wasted token. A review finds where they leak.
N+1 queries, missing indexes and no caching make you over-provision and overpay. Fixing them drops your bill and your latency.
Rate limiting alone can stop a single abused endpoint from running up a four-figure charge — that's the $49 paid back a hundred times.
Illustrative — actual waste depends on your code. Some apps have little; many vibe-coded ones have a lot. What's fixed: the audit is $49 once; any savings recur every month.
Priced to sit exactly where it should:
Want us to fix what we find? We quote you clearly afterwards — no obligation.
One real senior engineer reads your code and delivers a prioritized report, critical risks first — plus a 15-minute call.
Get your senior audit $49● Money-back guarantee — not useful, full refund.
Read-only access · never executed · deleted after the audit
